I have an issue with taking pictures of people when traveling.
In the past year and half going through Thailand, India, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam I’ve come across several situations of travelers snapping away at locals. Sometimes it’s in a situation that I find okay – like, say, with a tour guide who really makes you laugh (and you’re paying) or when there’s some type of display, gathering or performance.
But more often than not, it makes me uncomfortable. Like, really, uncomfortable. Sure, I understand when you see something or someone different than you who’s intriguing that you want to capture the moment. People are always more interesting than things…and you see a lot of interesting people when you’re moving from place to place. But is it okay? Appropriate? Polite?
What if you go somewhere where people are part of the attraction – like a Thai hill tribe or artisan factory? (Interesting take on Thai hill tribes here.) What about the people just minding their own business working at a noodle stand? Or a group of students walking to school all in their matching uniforms?
I often see it as at least annoying, but usually invasive. Many times people are going about their daily lives, and while it’s different from yours, they’re not putting on a show for you. If I had tourists taking pictures of me while I walked from the train station to work everyday in Seattle, I wouldn’t have liked it at all and felt uncomfortable. I don’t want other people thinking that I see them as an object of amusement.
Take Luang Prabang in Laos for example – here is a place where the daily morning practice of giving alms to the monks is still very apparent. It’s one of the only places where you can easily see hundreds of monks walking through the city collecting food from the townspeople. It’s beautiful and and peaceful and so different from home. But it’s gotten to the point that while the monks are walking around, the streets are crawling with snap-happy tourists, many who don’t seem to think much about discretion. I saw travelers with huge cameras following the monks and crouching around them – or sometimes even standing above them which is considered majorly disrespectful – and shoving their lens into the faces of 8-year-old novices. Not okay.
Exhibit A:
It ruins a certain aspect of the practice and shows a clear lack of respect for the people living there trying to go about their normal lives. I visited during the rainy season, but I can’t imagine what it’s like in the high season.
Also…why, when you’re somewhere other than home, does it seem to be okay to take pictures of children? Would you ever see a cute, little kid at home and whip out your camera? No, probably not. It’s weird.
On the other hand, there have also been many times in the past 18 months that I’ve been the object of people’s viewfinders. Like in India, the land of staring and being too close for comfort, I even had someone thrust their baby into my arms and start taking photos. It’s natural to be interested in people who are different from you – who look different, speak differently, do things differently. It’s not necessarily rude or offensive, simply curiosity and genuine interest in other people.
But there still should be limits and awareness of other people’s privacy and anonymity.
What do you think? Where are your boundaries when it comes to taking pictures of people?
Hey! I'm Alana and I've spent nearly the past decade living in Chiang Mai, Thailand, working as a writer and photographer. I started Paper Planes as a place to share local insight, special places, and how to travel well through a range of experiences — from hostels to high-end hotels, street meat to multi-course meals.
New places are always calling my name...
Enter your email for a taste of different worlds, must-read posts, and special offers.
(Don't worry, I'll never spam you — just send the good stuff.)
I would have to empathize with many of your feelings of discomfort here. I often feel hesitant taking a photo, and tend to use my telephoto lens to capture people from a distance – but does that make it any less invasive? not really – it only satisfies my own comfort to a small degree – but were the tables turned, I don’t know how i’d feel about people secretly taking photos of me from a distance! ha. Thanks for writing this! Great thoughts!
Taking pictures from a distance is better than shoving your camera in someone’s face or blatantly snapping away while they’re going about their business, but I know what you mean, ultimately you’re still taking someone’s photo. I don’t know what the right answer to this is except just realizing it comes down to reading the situation and using your best judgement.
As a blond toddler in Hawaii, you were the focus of attention for many Japanese honeymooners:) Quite odd to find your child being photographed like that! We usually turn the other way when cameras are being waved around in tourist areas, and try not to focus on individuals while taking our own photos – but the monk with the pink parasol was a must!
This is one that I struggled with when I was visiting rural parts of Peru. The women’s dresses were just so beautiful and colourful that I felt like going trigger happy, but I had to refrain myself knowing that that would make me the annoying tourist. in the end i took a few discreet shots from a distance. there were also people dressed in traditional clothes who you could photograph in exchange for a few dollars. that seems fair to me since they are posing for you, often with a cute llama…
Well, as long as they threw a cute llama into the deal…
This is always a tricky subject. Getting in another person’s face, without their consent, in order to take a photo is just downright rude and disrespectful. I think I’d actually scold a stranger for doing it if I saw it happening.
I’m not sure where you draw the line on this – it’s vague and fuzzy, and some people obviously have more stringent guidelines than others. If I were to take a photo of a stranger, but they looked visibly uncomfortable or a bit alarmed afterwards, I’d delete it. Now as for adorable kids…honestly it depends. If a child is playing or looks happy, fine. I’m always very uncomfortable with photos of kids from 3rd world countries where they look sad, unless it’s from a news publication.
Weird about the formatting…your comment actually came through in all caps for some reason…
I still don’t know what I think about photographing children – unless their parents are there and say it’s okay it seems a little invasive. I mean, I would never photograph children at home, it would be seen as inappropriate, so why is it okay here? Tricky, tricky…
Great post, alana. I also wrote a similar post about this subject back in October, here: http://www.mappingwords.com/2012/10/19/when-is-travel-photography-inappropriate/
I agree with you in many ways. We must use good judgement when deciding whether the photo is ethical or not. I’m always pretty cautious when photographing people, because I don’t want to be invasive, but sometimes I’ve gone ahead and taken photos anyway, especially if I’m in an area with lots of people snapping away. Other times I’ve asked for permission, but I’m usually really shy about doing that…
I normally just end up being shy and not asking and not taking the photo, but then I’m sometimes disappointed that I didn’t ‘capture’ something.